Competition is for Losers (talk by Peter Thiel)
Original
- Businesses create X$ of value and capture Y% of it. Those are independent
variables and you need both to be fairly high for a very successful business.
- Competition and monopoly have their pros and cons but generally it's hard to
have a profitable business in a very competitive markets.
- Actual difference between businesses in competitive markets and monopolies is
greater than perceived because it's better for both to be seen as being
somewhere in the middle.
- If you look like a monopoly, the regulators will come after you.
- If you look like just another company in a huge competitive market, it's
hard to raise money.
- The narratives get tailored to make the market look bigger or smaller.
- We can ask: what is their main cash cow (or cash cows) and what are its
competitors? Then we immediately see that Google is a monopoly in online
search and "the only English restaurant in Palo Alto" is just another
restaurant.
- Easy way to start as a monopoly is to find a small underserved niche and make
a superior product for it. Ideally you want to be able to grow your target
market in steps as you grow and gain ability to dominate bigger markets.
- In tech every moment happens only once. Unique businesses capture some unique
advantage that can't really be replicated. Competitors would need to be
qualitatively different to succeed, and that's what you're looking for.
- Moat tools:
- Proprietary tech, IP,
- Network effects,
- Branding (although I don't like to only depend on branding),
- Economies of scale (software is very good at this),
- You want to have a lasting advantage. Often it's not the first mover, but the
last mover that gets it.
- Growth rates are overrated, durability is underrated. You want to do the last
breakthrough, to be the last man standing, so it's important to understand
the endgame well.
- Some recipes:
- Verically integrated complex monopolies (e.g. Ford, Standard Oil, Tesla).
- Software, because you can grow very fast.
- Competition:
- Losers are not the ones who can't compete, it's the ones who do compete.
The winners just avoid competition altogether.
From Q/A:
- We're too focused on iteration instead of fundamental breakthroughs.
- The tendency to see competition as validation is deep, so asperger people
have an advantage.